Wanganui

Main Menu

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt

Wanganui

Header Banner

Wanganui

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt
Creative Destruction
Home›Creative Destruction›Larsen & Toubro (NSE: LT) seems to be using debt quite wisely

Larsen & Toubro (NSE: LT) seems to be using debt quite wisely

By Judy Grier
September 21, 2021
0
0


Berkshire Hathaway’s Charlie Munger-backed external fund manager Li Lu is quick to say “The biggest risk in investing is not price volatility, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital”. When we think about how risky a business is, we always like to look at its use of debt because debt overload can lead to bankruptcy. We note that Larsen & Toubro Limited (NSE: LT) has debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt makes the business risky.

When Is Debt a Problem?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is unable to repay its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. An integral part of capitalism is the process of “creative destruction” where bankrupt companies are ruthlessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more common (but still costly) event is when a company has to issue stock at bargain prices, constantly diluting shareholders, just to strengthen its balance sheet. By replacing dilution, however, debt can be a very good tool for companies that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we look at debt levels, we first consider both liquidity and debt levels.

Check out our latest analysis for Larsen & Toubro

What is the debt of Larsen and Toubro?

The image below, which you can click for more details, shows that Larsen & Toubro had a debt of 1.35 t at the end of March 2021, a reduction from 1.43 t over one year. However, he also had 450.0 billion yen in cash, so his net debt is 896.3 billion yen.

History of debt to equity of NSEI: LT September 21, 2021

A look at the responsibilities of Larsen & Toubro

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Larsen & Toubro had liabilities of 1.37 t due within 12 months and liabilities of 859.5 billion due beyond. On the other hand, he had 450.0 billion yen in cash and 906.0 billion yen in receivables due within one year. Thus, its liabilities exceed the sum of its cash and its (short-term) receivables by 877.5 billion euros.

While that might sound like a lot, it’s not that bad since Larsen & Toubro has a massive market cap of 2.39 tons, and could therefore likely strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if needed. But it is clear that it is absolutely necessary to take a close look at whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

We use two main ratios to inform us about the levels of debt compared to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is the number of times its profit before interest and taxes (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its coverage of interest, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute amount of debt (with net debt versus EBITDA) and the actual interest charges associated with this debt (with its coverage rate). interests).

Larsen & Toubro has a debt / EBITDA ratio of 4.6 and its EBIT covers its interest expense 5.1 times. Overall, this implies that while we wouldn’t like to see debt levels rise, we believe it can handle its current leverage. It is also important to note that Larsen & Toubro increased its EBIT by a very respectable 27% last year, thus improving its ability to repay its debt. There is no doubt that we learn the most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Larsen & Toubro’s ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So, if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free analyst earnings forecast report interesting.

But our last consideration is also important, because a business cannot pay its debts with paper profits; he needs hard cash. We must therefore clearly check whether this EBIT generates a corresponding free cash flow. Over the past three years, Larsen & Toubro has recorded free cash flow of 42% of its EBIT, which is lower than expected. This low cash conversion makes debt management more difficult.

Our point of view

Based on our analysis, Larsen & Toubro’s EBIT growth rate should indicate that it will not have too many problems with its debt. However, our other observations were not so encouraging. In particular, net debt to EBITDA gives us shivers. Looking at all of this data, we feel a little cautious about Larsen & Toubro’s debt levels. While we understand that debt can improve returns on equity, we suggest shareholders watch their debt level closely, lest they increase. When analyzing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious starting point. However, not all investment risks lie on the balance sheet – far from it. For example, we discovered 5 warning signs for Larsen & Toubro (1 makes us a little uncomfortable!) Which you should be aware of before investing here.

At the end of the day, it’s often best to focus on businesses with no net debt. You can access our special list of these companies (all with a history of profit growth). It’s free.

If you are looking to trade Larsen & Toubro, open an account with the cheapest * professional approved platform, Interactive Brokers. Their clients from more than 200 countries and territories trade stocks, options, futures, currencies, bonds and funds around the world from a single integrated account. Promoted

This Simply Wall St article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts using only unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell shares and does not take into account your goals or your financial situation. Our aim is to bring you long-term, targeted analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not take into account the latest announcements from price sensitive companies or qualitative documents. Simply Wall St has no position in the mentioned stocks.
*Interactive Brokers Ranked Least Expensive Broker By StockBrokers.com Online Annual Review 2020

Do you have any feedback on this item? Are you worried about the content? Get in touch with us directly. You can also send an email to the editorial team (at) simplywallst.com.


Related posts:

  1. A maternity and clever loan
  2. Non – bank loans immediately on account
  3. 6 most important information about your loan to watch
  4. This is Why High Union Electronics (GTSM: 6266) Can Responsibly Handle Debt
Tagsanalysis basedbuy selldata noteeditorial teamfinancial situationfundamental datageneral naturelong termnote analysisprice sensitiverecommendation buysimply wallst articleteam simplywallstwall st

Recent Posts

  • XPeng Stock: Anchored in Valuation, Not Speculation (NYSE: XPEV)
  • Balenciaga’s trashed sneakers divide opinion and tap into fashion history
  • US States Struggle to Replace Tax Revenue from Fossil Fuels | News, Sports, Jobs
  • MarketInk: Newsradio KOGO Wins Regional Edward R. Murrow Award
  • Scarlet Witch Fills Out The Original MCU Hulk Arc

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • September 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2010

Categories

  • Creative Destruction
  • Debt
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy