Wanganui

Main Menu

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt

Wanganui

Header Banner

Wanganui

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt
Tax Haven
Home›Tax Haven›Higley voters to weigh in on property tax hike | New

Higley voters to weigh in on property tax hike | New

By Judy Grier
September 27, 2021
0
0


Voters within the boundaries of the Higley Unified School District will decide whether they want a higher property tax to pay off a proposed $ 95 million bond to fund things such as building renovations, replacing aging buses and purchase of one of the two controversial leases.

Ballots begin to be distributed on October 6 to voters eligible for the November 2 postal election. The last day to register to vote is October 4.

“Without the passage of the bond, Higley USD will face the wider impact of reduced public funding for education,” said Ben Harrison, chairman of the Bond Political Action Committee. “Facilities that need repairs will be ignored. Students who need devices to support learning will not receive them.

“And, HUSD will be in a bad position to deal with the growth that Higley is currently experiencing.”

During the recession, the state cut funding for schools, forcing many districts to delay projects.

Since 2009, the state has cut public schools by $ 4.56 billion and those cuts have not been reinstated, according to the Arizona School Boards Association.

HUSD says it is one of the fastest growing school districts in the state and expects it will add 3,000 more students to its current number of 12,500 over the next five years.

“For the general public, it is difficult to understand how our state leaders have funding shortfalls compared to the common sense needs of our students and teachers, but this perception does not change the reality of the needs of schools,” he said. Harrison said, adding:

“Districts continue to push forward these liaison and priority efforts because they are faced with needs that are not being met by our state legislature. This has been the situation for decades and it never should have been. ”

Harrison, a former district teacher, said PAC so far sees support for the link.

“From the community, there has been a tremendous amount of conversation and positivity to support our school community with the bond,” he said. “It seems our message to move the district forward together has resonated with voters. ”

The bond with interest would cost homeowners about $ 137 million when it is paid off. For a typical house with an estimated value of $ 250,000, the property tax is estimated at $ 163 per year, according to the district election brochure.

There is no argument against the link in the brochure. Bond spending would be spread over five years.

The last time voters decided on an education spending measure was in 2019 when they approved a continuation of a 15 percent waiver, funded by a property tax increase.

The district is proposing to spend the bulk of the bond – 33.7% or $ 32 million – to withdraw one of the two controversial and costly leases signed in 2012.

At the time, the district was experiencing explosive growth in student numbers and entered into agreements whereby it leased two new buildings for 40 years to a non-profit organization. The buildings currently house the Cooley and Sossaman campuses, the first and only colleges in the district.

The total cost of the two leases over their lifetime to the district is nearly $ 160 million, according to the state’s auditor general in July.

The move ended up costing the district three times as much as it would have cost for an outright purchase, the district’s interim financial director said in April during discussions about the obligation.

The Auditor General’s findings were the result of an investigation into then-superintendent Denise Birdwell’s relationships during her employment with HUSD.

A grand jury indicted Birdwell for allegedly designing the leases by rigging bids and taking winnings. She is also accused of embezzling public funds while in the district. She and two others involved in the case have a trial date set for April 7, 2022.

The next big spend is $ 27 million for more classrooms, the addition of specialized building spaces, and building upgrades and renovations.

Technology and security projects represent 16.3% of bond spending. The projects included teachers ‘and students’ laptops, network and wireless, phones and projectors.

The district is also looking to spend $ 11 million to perform major maintenance work such as replacing HVAC units and roofing and flooring projects; $ 3.5 million for replacement buses and $ 2.5 million to purchase land to build a potential school north of Pecos Road.


Related posts:

  1. Financial result – the difference between revenues
  2. 8 financial principles to understand
  3. Alder grants tax reduction to Antillean Manor
  4. Vic introduces the primary tax on electrical automobiles in Aust | Camden Haven Courier

Recent Posts

  • How 2022 differs from 2018
  • Is there an opportunity with the 50% undervaluation of Wallbox NV (NYSE: WBX)?
  • Off-season shifts Wafer prices rise, 1Q22 smelter production value up 8.2% QoQ, according to TrendForce
  • The ultimate challenge
  • The intrinsic value of Midwich Group plc (LON:MIDW) is potentially 69% higher than its share price

Archives

  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • September 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2010

Categories

  • Creative Destruction
  • Debt
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy