Wanganui

Main Menu

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt

Wanganui

Header Banner

Wanganui

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt
Creative Destruction
Home›Creative Destruction›Here’s why Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) has significant debt

Here’s why Warner Music Group (NASDAQ:WMG) has significant debt

By Judy Grier
March 21, 2022
0
0

David Iben said it well when he said: “Volatility is not a risk that interests us. What matters to us is to avoid the permanent loss of capital. When we think of a company’s risk, we always like to look at its use of debt, because over-indebtedness can lead to ruin. Like many other companies Warner Music Group Corp. (NASDAQ:WMG) uses debt. But does this debt worry shareholders?

Why is debt risky?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company cannot easily repay it, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. An integral part of capitalism is the process of “creative destruction” where bankrupt companies are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is when a company has to dilute shareholders at a cheap share price just to keep debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, especially capital-intensive businesses. The first step when considering a company’s debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

Check out our latest analysis for Warner Music Group

How much debt does Warner Music Group have?

You can click on the chart below for historical numbers, but it shows that as of December 2021, Warner Music Group had $3.86 billion in debt, an increase from $3.42 billion, on a year. However, since it has a cash reserve of $450.0 million, its net debt is less, at around $3.41 billion.

NasdaqGS: WMG Debt to Equity History as of March 21, 2022

How strong is Warner Music Group’s balance sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Warner Music Group had liabilities of $3.36 billion due within the year, and liabilities of $4.49 billion due thereafter. In return, it had $450.0 million in cash and $941.0 million in receivables to be received within 12 months. Thus, its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (current) receivables by $6.45 billion.

While that might sound like a lot, it’s not too bad since Warner Music Group has a huge market capitalization of US$19.2 billion, so it could probably bolster its balance sheet by raising capital if needed. But we definitely want to keep our eyes peeled for indications that its debt is too risky.

We measure a company’s leverage against its earning power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and calculating how easily its earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT ) covers its interest charge (interest coverage). The advantage of this approach is that we consider both the absolute amount of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expense associated with that debt (with its interest coverage ratio ).

Warner Music Group’s debt is 3.5 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT covers its interest expense 5.4 times. This suggests that while debt levels are significant, we will refrain from labeling them as problematic. We also note that Warner Music Group improved its EBIT from last year’s loss to a positive result of $652 million. When analyzing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious starting point. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Warner Music Group’s ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet in the future. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free analyst earnings forecast report interesting.

Finally, a company can only repay its debts with cold hard cash, not with book profits. It is therefore worth checking how much of earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) is supported by free cash flow. In the most recent year, Warner Music Group reported free cash flow of 26% of EBIT, which is weaker than expected. It’s not great when it comes to paying off debt.

Our point of view

Warner Music Group’s net debt to EBITDA and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow were disheartening. But it’s not so bad to cover its interest expense with its EBIT. Considering the above factors, we believe that Warner Music Group’s debt poses certain risks to the business. So even if this leverage increases return on equity, we wouldn’t really want to see it increase from now on. There is no doubt that we learn the most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risks reside on the balance sheet, far from it. To do this, you need to find out about the 3 warning signs we spotted some with Warner Music Group (including 1 which is a bit unpleasant).

In the end, it’s often best to focus on companies that aren’t in debt. You can access our special list of these companies (all with a track record of earnings growth). It’s free.

Feedback on this article? Concerned about content? Get in touch with us directly. You can also email the editorial team (at) Simplywallst.com.

This Simply Wall St article is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell stocks and does not take into account your objectives or financial situation. Our goal is to bring you targeted long-term analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not take into account the latest announcements from price-sensitive companies or qualitative materials. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

Related posts:

  1. We believe Livent (NYSE: LTHM) has fair debt
  2. Is Stalprodukt (WSE: STP) using too much debt?
  3. Are Lonking Holdings (HKG: 3339) using too much debt?
  4. These 4 metrics indicate that Fortune Electric (TPE: 1519) is using debt safely
Tagsanalysis basedbuy selldata noteeditorial teamfinancial situationfundamental datageneral naturelong termnote analysisprice sensitiverecommendation buysimply wallst articleteam simplywallstwall st

Recent Posts

  • XPeng Stock: Anchored in Valuation, Not Speculation (NYSE: XPEV)
  • Balenciaga’s trashed sneakers divide opinion and tap into fashion history
  • US States Struggle to Replace Tax Revenue from Fossil Fuels | News, Sports, Jobs
  • MarketInk: Newsradio KOGO Wins Regional Edward R. Murrow Award
  • Scarlet Witch Fills Out The Original MCU Hulk Arc

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • September 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2010

Categories

  • Creative Destruction
  • Debt
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy