Wanganui

Main Menu

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt

Wanganui

Header Banner

Wanganui

  • Creative Destruction
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Debt
Terminal Value
Home›Terminal Value›Here’s why shareholders may want to be cautious with the increase in the CEO compensation package of Nasdaq, Inc. (NASDAQ: NDAQ)

Here’s why shareholders may want to be cautious with the increase in the CEO compensation package of Nasdaq, Inc. (NASDAQ: NDAQ)

By Judy Grier
June 8, 2021
0
0



CEO Adena Friedman has done a decent job of delivering relatively good performance to Nasdaq, Inc. (NASDAQ: NDAQ) recently. In view of this performance, the compensation of the CEO will probably not be the main objective of the shareholders on the occasion of the General Meeting of June 15, 2021. However, some shareholders may still hesitate to be too generous with the compensation of the CEO .

Comparison of Nasdaq, Inc. CEO Compensation with Industry

Our data indicates that Nasdaq, Inc. has a market capitalization of US $ 28 billion and that the CEO’s total annual compensation was reported at US $ 16 million for the year through December 2020. These include an increase of 14% over the previous year. While we always look at total compensation first, our analysis shows that the salary component is smaller, at US $ 1.2 million.

Compared to other companies in the industry with market capitalizations exceeding US $ 8.0 billion, the reported median total CEO compensation was US $ 12 million. This suggests that Adena Friedman is paid more than the industry median. Additionally, Adena Friedman directly owns $ 20 million in company stock, which means they are deeply invested in the company’s success.

Component 2020 2019 Proportion (2020)
Salary US $ 1.2 million US $ 1.0 million 7%
Other $ 15 million US $ 13 million 93%
Total compensation US $ 16 million $ 14 million 100%

In terms of industry, salary made up around 13% of total compensation for all the companies we analyzed, while other compensation made up 87% of the pie. In the case of the Nasdaq, non-salary compensation represents a larger share of total compensation, compared to the industry as a whole. If non-salary compensation dominates total salary, it is an indicator that the executive salary is linked to the performance of the company.

NasdaqGS: NDAQ CEO compensation June 8, 2021

Growth of Nasdaq, Inc.

Nasdaq, Inc.’s earnings per share (EPS) have grown 12% per year over the past three years. Last year, its turnover increased by 30%.

Shareholders would be happy to know that the company has improved over the past few years. The combination of strong revenue growth and improving EPS over the medium term is certainly indicative of the kind of growth we like to see. Historical performance can sometimes be a good indicator of what happens next, but if you want to take a look at the future of the business, this might be of interest to you. free viewing analyst forecasts.

Was Nasdaq, Inc. a Good Investment?

We believe the 87% three-year total shareholder return would leave most Nasdaq, Inc. shareholders smiling. So they might not be affected at all if the CEO were to be paid more than is normal for companies of the same size.

In summary…

Given that the overall performance of the company has been reasonable, the CEO compensation policy might not be the focus of shareholders at the next AGM. However, any decision to increase CEO compensation could face some objections from shareholders as the CEO is already paid more than the industry average.

CEO pay can have a huge impact on performance, but it’s only one element. We did our research and spotted 3 warning signs for the Nasdaq that investors should consider moving forward.

Shift gears from the Nasdaq, if you’re looking for a crisp balance sheet and premium returns, this free List of high yield, low leverage companies is a great place to look.

This Simply Wall St article is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell shares and does not take into account your goals or your financial situation. Our aim is to bring you long-term, targeted analysis based on fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not take into account the latest announcements from price sensitive companies or qualitative documents. Simply Wall St has no position in any of the stocks mentioned.

Do you have any feedback on this item? Are you worried about the content? Get in touch with us directly. You can also send an email to the editorial team (at) simplywallst.com.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.



Related posts:

  1. Installment loan for the unemployed
  2. How to assess the need for a payday loan?
  3. Do traders undervalue TV At the moment Community Restricted (NSE: TVTODAY) by 41%?
  4. Marilyn Hartman, “ Serial Stowaway, ” Arrested at Chicago O’Hare Worldwide Airport
Tagsanalysis basedbuy selldata noteeditorial teamfinancial situationfundamental datageneral naturelong termnote analysisprice sensitiverecommendation buysimply wallst articleteam simplywallstwall st

Recent Posts

  • XPeng Stock: Anchored in Valuation, Not Speculation (NYSE: XPEV)
  • Balenciaga’s trashed sneakers divide opinion and tap into fashion history
  • US States Struggle to Replace Tax Revenue from Fossil Fuels | News, Sports, Jobs
  • MarketInk: Newsradio KOGO Wins Regional Edward R. Murrow Award
  • Scarlet Witch Fills Out The Original MCU Hulk Arc

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • April 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • September 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • December 2016
  • August 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • September 2013
  • August 2010

Categories

  • Creative Destruction
  • Debt
  • First Theorem Of Welfare Economics
  • Tax Haven
  • Terminal Value
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy